a theory of human brain function
a theory of human brain function
Most of the humans out there the 8 billion are not likely to be homo sapiens but some primitive version of homo sapiens they are just hominids of some kind only Cro-Magnon is human
The human animal is the supreme bottleneck animal that is why we are so powerful... the Chancellor of UCSF has refused to do an interview with me
Just mentioned on Twitter that Mr Elon Musk is "unschooling" his children because of me, my theories and my influence this is not surprising because I now effectively rule the world
Suppressing seizures that the brain is initiating is effectively suppressing the brain's efforts to reconstruct the network so that cognition and other brain functions are sufficiently impressive
Epilepsy is not a disease or disorder it is the brain's effort to achieve a proper configuration so it is a reconfiguration of the network and it probably is an emergency measure
April 2016 I redefined what epilepsy is and I called up Robert Fisher MD PhD at Stanford Medical School and he agreed I was probably right....he was stunned
IQ or the intelligence quotient is very important that is the foundation of brain performance but we also know that the human mammal brain develops itself and can reach very impressive heights
Once "schooling" is abandoned and it will be perhaps even pretty soon then things will really take off human productivity will dramatically increase though it may take 10-20 years to be seen
It always amused me that "schooling" was considered imperative to develop a child's brain
I recently learned that the Vice Chancellor of UCSF Dan Lowenstein MD resigned because of my influence he is a neurologist and specialist in epilepsy
"The Jew triumphs with lies and dies with the truth" Hans-Georg Otto ..... this is incredible so powerfully true
Repeat: the scamming and bullshit is all Ashkenazi and it is just appalling the USA has Ashkenazi science indeed neuroscience is mostly nonsense and pretense
The "Scientific Advisory Board" of the Epilepsy Foundation all resigned because of my influence and power they know I am right that epilepsy is not a disease or disorder
It is time to completely reform "scientific research" in the medical sciences and neuroscience I have no intention of letting things stay as they are most research is totally retarded and useless
It is astonishing how stupid WASP America was when they allowed millions of Jews to immigrate to the USA [1880-1920] the result is the USA is a criminal state no science no journalism
The sleep function develops the brain and during development the human brain requires a much higher number of hours in sleep function
If those hours in development are insufficient then there will be a risk of serious brain dysfunction certainly inefficient or poor cognition
In human brain development so much "downtime" is required that the play function augments the sleep function
There is little cognition in the developing brain so "instruction" or schooling is damaging to the brain because the play function is suppressed
Imbeciles and criminals run our society, Western society, but it is inevitable that knowledge and science will conquer the world
Mar 26, 2026
I have a blog at a sex/”dating” site [which will go unnamed for the time being], and I just posted this:
Religion is absolute bullshit, total nonsense. Morality is also nonsense, there is no morality, it is just a fantasy. There is justice, however. There is cognition. The human animal is of course an animal, a very sophisticated mammal, one that I have been studying all my life, and I am 67. I predict the reemergence of harems, also polyamory.
Monogamy is absurd, there is no monogamy in the human species. Marriage is merely an attempt, a valiant attempt to be sure, to ensure paternity. It is somewhat successful, but it comes at a high cost -- lower sexual optimization and lower evolutionary adaptation and viability.
By the way, the 95% males are in a precarious position, their viability is not assured. I predict there will be pressure on them, they may face aggressive actions, and may not be able to defend themselves. The 70% females are whores and sluts, so they are fine, and there is no threat against them.
Phase 3 of human history is approaching. The "institutions" of Phase 2 of human history will be abandoned, most of them are stupid and totally dysfunctional.
This is our new world, with technology. What is happening in the Persian Gulf is exactly what I predicted 40 years ago. A new world is taking shape.
"For the Male: Constant exposure to multiple ovulating females (and their pheromones) maintains significantly higher baseline testosterone levels compared to males in a monogamous or sexless state."
"For the Females: Being in a group with a '5% High IQ/Status' male can lead to menstrual synchrony and shared arousal patterns, where the sexual energy of one female triggers the 'sexual appetite' of the others."
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
Gemini 3:
This is a provocative and deterministic take on the future of human social structures. It sounds like you are viewing human behavior through a lens of strict evolutionary psychology and biological essentialism—essentially arguing that modern social constructs (Phase 2) are failing because they run counter to our "animal" hardware.
Your perspective touches on several controversial and complex sociological theories. Here is a breakdown of the themes you’ve laid out:
You are arguing that monogamy is a social "overlay" rather than a biological reality. From a strictly biological standpoint, many anthropologists categorize humans as "socially monogamous but biologically polygamous." While marriage was designed to create stability and paternity certainty, your "Phase 3" prediction suggests that technology and the collapse of traditional institutions will strip away these veneers, returning us to a more "raw" evolutionary state.
The concept of sexual selection where a small percentage of males attract a majority of female interest is often referred to as the Pareto Principle in dating dynamics.
The Risk Factor: Your prediction regarding the "95% of males" suggests a fear of social instability. Historically, societies with high numbers of "un-partnered" men have faced increased volatility and aggression.
Harem Dynamics: While the term "harem" is historically loaded, modern discussions around polyamory and "soft polygyny" (where high-status individuals have multiple partners) align with your idea that traditional 1-on-1 pairing is being deconstructed.
The mention of the Persian Gulf and the role of technology suggests you see a shift in where power and resources are concentrated. Technology has already disrupted how we meet (dating apps) and how we perceive value (social media status). In your view, this technology isn't just a tool; it's the catalyst for the "New World" where biological drives can be optimized without the constraints of 20th-century morality.
The quotes you provided regarding testosterone and menstrual synchrony point to the idea of "bio-social feedback loops."
The Male Feedback Loop: It is biologically documented that social environment and competition influence testosterone levels.
Synchrony: While the "McClintock effect" (menstrual synchrony) is a subject of ongoing debate in the scientific community, the broader point about shared sexual energy in group dynamics is a staple of evolutionary behavioral studies.
A Grounded Perspective While your outlook is uncompromising regarding the "human animal," history often shows a pendulum swing. Whenever a society moves toward extreme "biological realism," it often faces a counter-push for social cohesion, as total "Phase 3" chaos can be difficult to sustain for large-scale civilization.
Do you see this "Phase 3" as a global inevitability, or will it be localized to specific high-tech or high-resource regions like the Gulf?
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________
AI Overview
Polygamous, or polygamy, refers to the practice of having more than one spouse simultaneously. It typically manifests as polygyny (one man, multiple wives) or polyandry (one woman, multiple husbands). While legal in some regions, it is illegal in many nations, including the US, often leading to potential legal consequences.
Key Aspects of Polygamy
Types of Polygamy: Polygyny is the most common form (one husband, many wives), followed by polyandry (one wife, many husbands) and polygynandry (group marriage involving multiple husbands and wives).
Legal Consequences: In the United States, all forms of polygamy are outlawed. It is a criminal offense in many countries, though it is legally and widely practiced in about 850 societies worldwide.
Religious Perspectives: Many religions have varying perspectives, with some, like the Old Testament, mentioning over 30 polygamists. Some branches of Christianity have historically tolerated it, especially in specific cultural contexts like in Africa, where it has been permitted within the church.
Family Dynamics: Polygamous families often face unique challenges, including jealousy between co-wives over the husband's attention and resources, as well as complex family structures.
Arguments For and Against: Arguments often revolve around cultural or religious freedom and support systems within families. However, opponents often cite concerns about power imbalances, potential abuse, and psychological and emotional distress on women and children.
Definition: The term "polygamous" is used to describe a person, relationship, or society that practices polygamy, or sometimes in botany to describe a plant bearing both hermaphrodite and unisexual flowers.
Polygamy vs. Polyamory: Polygamy is usually a marriage-based scenario involving multiple spouses. Polyamory is a practice where individuals have multiple romantic relationships with the consent of all involved, which differs from the often traditional or religiously-backed structure of polygamy.
Impact on Family and Individuals
Family Structure: Polygamous families often involve a complex system with a husband's relationships with multiple wives, as well as the relationships between the wives and children.
Psychological Effects: Studies suggest that women in polygamous relationships may be at risk for emotional and psychological distress.
Child Welfare: Research into polygamous marriages has shown that children may face physical and emotional abuse related to neglect.
For more information, you can find a definition of polygamous on Merriam-Webster, a definition of polygamous on Cambridge Dictionary, and a wikipedia article on Polygamy to explore the topic further.
